Grad student professor dating student
She is not supervised by Suplita as a student, and another psychology professor, not Suplita, supervised her and other teaching assistants, she said. 15 letter that Suplita “engaged in a prohibited consensual relationship with your graduate teaching assistant,” and announced it publicly on Facebook before the summer term ended.“The University prohibits all faculty and staff, including graduate assistants, from pursuing or engaging in dating or sexual relationships with students whom they currently supervise, teacher, or have authority over.”“I find that based on the preponderance of evidence you did violate the NDAH (Non-Discrimination and Ant-Harassment) Policy by pursuing or engaging in a dating or sexual relationship with your assigned teaching assistant ...
Whenever a teacher is or in the future might reasonably become responsible for teaching, advising, or directly supervising a student, a sexual relationship between them is inappropriate and must be avoided.Historically, male professors have considered a campus full of available young women a perk of academia.They used to call it the candy store, according to the Women’s Research & Education Institute.Fear of negative publicity feeds bureaucratic inaction, but as these reports also illustrate, the consequences of institutional indolence can be worse.For the victims of sexual harassment or abuse, it is far worse.Since then, many universities have begun to address student-professor dating.
University fraternization rules are sometimes vague. It is a commonly held belief that everyone is considered an adult at the college level and should know where to draw the line.
Teachers or students with questions about this policy are advised to consult with the University’s Title IX Coordinator, the Title IX school, or with the University-wide Committee on Sexual Misconduct.
A lecturer in the University of Georgia’s psychology department faces the loss of his job after UGA officials found him in violation, for the second time, of a school policy that prohibits professors from dating students under their supervision.
Attitudes began to change in the 1960s and 1970s, with the rise of feminism and an increasing number of female scholars in academia.
Real policy changes did not occur until the late 1980s and 1990s, when courts said schools could be held liable in sexual harassment cases.
15 letter to Suplita.“As a result of these findings,” Stevens continued, “and in review of your previous violation of this section of the NDAH policy, I am recommending your separation from ... I am also directing you to cease and desist all contact with your assigned students, effective immediately.”UGA has denied Suplita basic due process rights, he believes, pointing to concerns raised recently by legal scholars who argue that a new federal emphasis on protecting students from harassment and sexual abuse has led to rules that don’t give students or faculty accused of abuse the opportunity to adequately defend themselves.